Hamlet - The Real Tragedy Essays - Characters In Hamlet,

Hamlet - The "Real" Tragedy In Hamlet, by William Shakespeare, the death of a character becomes a frequent event. Although many people lose their lives as a result of their own self-centered wrong-doing, there are others whose death are a result of manipulation from the royalty. This is the case of Polonius' family. The real tragedy of Hamlet is not that of Hamlet or his family but of Polonius' family because their deaths were not the consequence of sinful actions of their own but rather by their innocent involvement in the schemes of Claudius and Hamlet. The first character to die in Hamlet is Polonius. Although Polonius often acts in a deceitful manner when dealing with Hamlet, it is only because he is carrying out plans devised by the king or queen to discover the nature of Hamlet's madness. Being the king's Lord Chamberlain, it is his duty to obey the king and queen's wishes and it is this loyalty that eventually proves to be fatal for him. An example of hoe Polonius' innocent involvement with the royalty results in his death can be found at the beginning of Act III, scene iv, when Hamlet stabs him while he is hiding behind the arras in Gertude's room. This shows how Polonius, a man unaware of the true nature of the situation he is in, is killed by a member of the royalty during the execution of one of their schemes. This makes Polonius' death a tragedy. The next member of Polonius' family to die is his daughter Ophelia. Ophelia's death is tragic because of her complete innocence in the situation. Some may argue that Polonius deserves his fate because of his deceitfulness in dealing with Hamlet while he is mad, but Ophelia is entirely manipulated and used by Hamlet and the king for their own selfish reasons. An example of how Ophelia is used by Hamlet takes place in Act II, scene I, when Hamlet uses her to convince his family he is mad. Ophelia explains to Polonius how Hamlet has scared her, causing Polonius to draw the conclusion that Hamlet has an "antic disposition". Although this is the subject to interpretation and many believe that this is simply Hamlet taking one last look at Ophelia before he becomes engaged in his plan to kill Claudius, the fact that he scares her and does not try to alleviate these fears points to the conclusion that he is simply using her to help word of his madness spread throughout the kingdom via Polonius. In Act III, scene iv, Hamlet kills Polonius while he is hiding behind the arras in the Queen's room. This event causes Ophelia to become insane and leads to her eventual death in a river near the castle in Act IV, scene vii. It can be seen how the combined scheming of Hamlet's scheme which brings about the death of Polonius which leads to Ophelia's death. The passing of Ophelia is a tragedy because she does nothing deserving of death, she is merely used for other people's personal gain. The last member of Polonius' family to die is Laertes, Ophelia's brother and Polonius's son. Laertes' death is tragic because, although he kills Hamlet, he is avenging his father's death, an act, with reference to the moral climate of the 1600s, that would have been condoned by the people who saw the play. The difference between Hamlet and Laertes is that Laertes does not use others to attain his goals and his revenge is in part due to the pressure put on him by Claudius. This makes Laertes' murder of Hamlet excusable and his death a tragedy. An example of how Claudius uses Laertes to try and murder Hamlet is seen in Act IV, scene vii. Claudius and Laertes are discussing Hamlet when Claudius says: Laertes, was your father dear to you? Or are you like painting of a sorrow, A face without a heart? He is asking Laertes whether he is really sorry about his father's death or if he is just acting mournful without feeling mournful. Claudius uses these lines to lead Laertes into a plan to kill Hamlet, asking him what will he do to prove his

Free Essays on Porn Analysis

Pornography Issues Analysis Since the mid-1980s, a strange sight has been on the political horizon. Feminists are standing alongside their archenemies,  ¡Ã‚ §conservatives and religious fundamentalists, ¡Ã‚ ¨ to call anti-pornography laws. This phenomenon threatens the well being of women in at least three important ways: feminism is no longer a stronghold of freedom of speech, women ¡Ã‚ ¦s unacceptable sexual choices are now under new attack, it involves rejecting the principle  ¡Ã‚ §a woman ¡Ã‚ ¦s body, a woman ¡Ã‚ ¦s right ¡Ã‚ ¨ (McElroy). According to University of Michigan professor, Catharina MacKinnon, who helped write the law brief,  ¡Ã‚ §in the US, the obscenity laws are all about not liking to see naked bodies, or homosexual activity, in public. Our laws in the US don ¡Ã‚ ¦t consist the harm to women. But in Canada it will now be materials that subordinate, degrade women that are obscene ¡Ã‚ ¨ (Hill and Silver). In 1983 and 1984, the Minneapolis city council passed the first civil rights antipornography ordinance written by MacKinnon and Dworkin, only to have it vetoed by the mayor both times. Then in Indianapolis the city council passed and the mayor signed the first version of the Dworkin-MacKinnon Ordinance was adopted in Bellingham, Washington by voter initiative, gathering over 62 percent of the vote. It met similar fate as the Indianapolis ordinance when Federal District Court Judge Carolyn Dimmick turned it down (Hill and Silver). Andrea Dworkin, the author to  ¡Ã‚ §Reply to John Irving, ¡Ã‚ ¨ critiques Irving ¡Ã‚ ¦s essay like he was a merciless, no good, vicious criminal. We all know that she stands very clearly on the side of antipornography. In her response, she uses her personal experiences to get her point across. This essay appeared in The New York Times in the March issue of 1992 (Selzer 526). This is about eleven years ago. Without a doubt, society sure has changed. These days you can ¡Ã‚ ¦t watch a T.V. show with... Free Essays on Porn Analysis Free Essays on Porn Analysis Pornography Issues Analysis Since the mid-1980s, a strange sight has been on the political horizon. Feminists are standing alongside their archenemies,  ¡Ã‚ §conservatives and religious fundamentalists, ¡Ã‚ ¨ to call anti-pornography laws. This phenomenon threatens the well being of women in at least three important ways: feminism is no longer a stronghold of freedom of speech, women ¡Ã‚ ¦s unacceptable sexual choices are now under new attack, it involves rejecting the principle  ¡Ã‚ §a woman ¡Ã‚ ¦s body, a woman ¡Ã‚ ¦s right ¡Ã‚ ¨ (McElroy). According to University of Michigan professor, Catharina MacKinnon, who helped write the law brief,  ¡Ã‚ §in the US, the obscenity laws are all about not liking to see naked bodies, or homosexual activity, in public. Our laws in the US don ¡Ã‚ ¦t consist the harm to women. But in Canada it will now be materials that subordinate, degrade women that are obscene ¡Ã‚ ¨ (Hill and Silver). In 1983 and 1984, the Minneapolis city council passed the first civil rights antipornography ordinance written by MacKinnon and Dworkin, only to have it vetoed by the mayor both times. Then in Indianapolis the city council passed and the mayor signed the first version of the Dworkin-MacKinnon Ordinance was adopted in Bellingham, Washington by voter initiative, gathering over 62 percent of the vote. It met similar fate as the Indianapolis ordinance when Federal District Court Judge Carolyn Dimmick turned it down (Hill and Silver). Andrea Dworkin, the author to  ¡Ã‚ §Reply to John Irving, ¡Ã‚ ¨ critiques Irving ¡Ã‚ ¦s essay like he was a merciless, no good, vicious criminal. We all know that she stands very clearly on the side of antipornography. In her response, she uses her personal experiences to get her point across. This essay appeared in The New York Times in the March issue of 1992 (Selzer 526). This is about eleven years ago. Without a doubt, society sure has changed. These days you can ¡Ã‚ ¦t watch a T.V. show with...

Melbourne 2030 and most other strategic plans across Australia seek to Essay

Melbourne 2030 and most other strategic plans across Australia seek to increase residential development around activity centr - Essay Example In most suburbs of Melbourne, changes to the built environment have been brought about. â€Å"The Melbourne regional plan, like all of the Australian metropolitan plans, puts forth a spatial vision of the future† (Beatley & Newman 2009, p.196), directs future investments, and guides the state and local use of development decisions. The foremost aim is to accommodate significant population growth, anticipating up to a million new residents by 2030. The core concepts of the development plan include an urban growth boundary, the protection of ‘green wedges’, and the guidance of future growth into a set of activity centres located along transit corridors. The key strategy of the plan is to increase residential development around activity centres. Thesis Statement: The purpose of this paper is to investigate the strategic plans for residential development around activity centres in the policy ‘Melbourne 2030’ for urban developmental projects; and determine their benefits and disadvantages. ‘Melbourne 2030’: Background of the Policy ‘Melbourne 2030’ guides the development of built environment in the city in the form of accommodation for an increase in the population by one million residents between 2000 and 2030. The addition in numbers together with projected changes in household formation is expected to increase the number of households by 600,000 by 2030. ‘Melbourne 2030’ seeks to chart a â€Å"fundamentally new direction in Melbourne’s urban development by determining the location of the dwellings needed to accommodate these additional households† (Birrell, O’Connor, Rapson et al 2005, p.1-1). The city’s sense of place and identity is created by the streetscape that existed till now with mostly low slung bungalows, dense tree and shrub canopy and resultant green ambience, together with open spaces for recreation. Over half a century ago, Melbourne’s metropol itan planners considered these features to be the way residents liked it, and that it was futile to try changing the local characteristics. Currently 90 percent of the families live in single family dwellings, with 50 percent of the dwellings owned by occupants. According to Birrell et al (2005, p.1-1), â€Å"the Melbourne 2030 template is just the most recent incarnation of a radical shift in metropolitan planning since the 1980s†. This transition intends to reshape the city, changing it from its low density heritage towards a more compressedly packed and merged urban form. Strategic Plan of ‘Melbourne 2030’ ‘Melbourne 2030’ underscored two predominant land use strategies. The first was an urban growth boundary demarcated to protect the city’s green wedges,and rural boundary from urban encroachment by constraining future development within this limit, state Buxton and Goodman (2003, p.205). The second key land-use approach was to â€Å"conce ntrate spatial development within a constellation of 112 activity centres of differing scale and mix distibuted across the city, with several of the centres located on chief public transport nodes† (Dodson 2009, p.5). Future housing is divided into three categories: greenfields development, strategic redevelopment sites, and dispersed urban sites within peripheral suburban areas, together with development to a small extent around small rural